Public Notes

UPSC foundations · Note 028

Peasant and tribal revolts before 1857

Modern India to 1857 · Reference edition 1 November 2026 · 2 min read

Study context: GS I — Modern Indian history from about the middle of the eighteenth century until the present — significant events, personalities, issues.

Long before the revolt of 1857, peasants and tribal peoples rose against British rule, moneylenders, and landlords. These revolts are often overshadowed by 1857, but they show that resistance was widespread and rooted in local grievances, not invented by a single conspiracy. They also show that the Company's revenue demands, its courts, and its support for landlords and moneylenders were felt as a single system of oppression in the village.

The Paika rebellion of 1817 in Odisha was one of the earliest. The Paikas, a militia class who held land in return for military service, rose under Bakshi Jagabandhu after the Company took their land and changed the revenue system. The Kol rebellion of 1831 to 1832 in the Chota Nagpur region followed the transfer of tribal land to outsiders and the exactions of moneylenders. The largest of these risings was the Santhal rebellion of 1855 to 1856, when the Santhals of the Rajmahal hills rose against moneylenders, landlords, and Company officials, under the leadership of the brothers Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu.

The Santhal rebellion was crushed with great severity, and the Company afterwards created a separate Santhal Pargana district to administer the area, a concession that acknowledged the depth of the grievance without removing its causes. Other revolts followed similar patterns: a local trigger, often a moneylender's fraud or a new tax, a rising that targeted officials and landlords, and a military suppression followed by a small administrative reform.

These revolts matter for two reasons. First, they show that the discontent of 1857 had deep local roots in revenue, debt, and land. Second, they show the limits of early resistance: the rebels were locally organised, lacked coordination across regions, and could not match the Company's army. The national movement that followed would learn from this, building the organisation and communication that the early rebels lacked.

Key takeaways

  • The Paika rising of 1817, the Kol rising of 1831-1832, and the Santhal rising of 1855-1856 preceded 1857.
  • The Santhal rising, led by Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu, was crushed and followed by the creation of Santhal Pargana.
  • Early revolts were local, driven by land, debt, and revenue, and lacked all-India coordination.

Why it matters for civil studies

It shows that 1857 did not come from nowhere — it grew from decades of local revolt against the same grievances.

Think it through

Why did these revolts fail to join together, and what would a movement need in order to do so?

From the Public Notes companion study collection. Editorial context and corrections.

WhatsApp