Public Notes

UPSC foundations · Note 131

How India counts poverty

Development, poverty and employment · Reference edition 1 November 2026 · 2 min read

Study context: GS III — Inclusive growth and issues arising from it; issues relating to poverty and hunger. Also touches GS I: poverty and developmental issues.

Poverty is not a physical fact like height; it is measured against a line, and where the line is drawn changes who counts as poor. India has traditionally measured poverty by consumption expenditure: households are surveyed on what they spend, and those spending below a threshold are counted as poor. The threshold is the poverty line, and the share of people below it is the poverty ratio. Because the line is a judgement — what basket of goods is the minimum for a dignified life? — rival committees have produced different numbers from the same surveys.

The Tendulkar Committee, which reported in 2009, moved the line from a calorie-only basket to one covering food, education and health, and set monthly per capita lines of Rs 816 for rural areas and Rs 1,000 for urban areas at 2011-12 prices. On that basis the Planning Commission estimated poverty at 21.9 per cent in 2011-12, down from 37.2 per cent in 2004-05. The Rangarajan Committee, which reported in 2014, used a wider basket and higher lines — Rs 972 rural and Rs 1,407 urban — and estimated poverty at 29.5 per cent for the same year. The two figures describe the same country in the same year: the gap is entirely about method.

A second approach counts deprivations directly. The National Multidimensional Poverty Index, published by NITI Aayog, uses 12 indicators across health, education and living standards, and counts a household as poor if it is deprived in a weighted combination of them. Its discussion paper reported multidimensional poverty falling from 29.17 per cent in 2013-14 to 11.28 per cent in 2022-23, with about 24.82 crore people moving out of multidimensional poverty in that period. Critics note that the 2013-14 figure is an estimate built from earlier survey data and the 2022-23 figure a projection from the 2019-21 survey, so the numbers should be read as indicative, not as precise annual counts.

International comparisons add a third lens. The World Bank, using its extreme poverty line, estimated India's extreme poverty rate at 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, down from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12. No single measure settles the question of how many Indians are poor. Consumption lines miss deprivations in health and schooling; multidimensional indices involve judgement in weighting; and all measures depend on surveys that are infrequent and contested. The honest answer in civil studies is to state the measure, the year and the source — and to note that poverty has fallen on most measures, while remaining a mass phenomenon.

Key takeaways

  • The Tendulkar method put poverty at 21.9 per cent in 2011-12; Rangarajan's wider basket put it at 29.5 per cent for the same year.
  • The multidimensional index counts deprivations in health, education and living standards, not just spending.
  • The World Bank's extreme poverty estimate for India fell to 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, but all measures depend on method and survey data.

Why it matters for civil studies

Poverty numbers drive welfare policy, so understanding how they are built is essential to judging claims about progress.

Think it through

If two honest methods give 22 per cent and 30 per cent for the same year, which should a government use to target help?

From the Public Notes companion study collection. Editorial context and corrections.

WhatsApp